Building AI Automations

1. Capture. A form or chatbot collects a lead.
2. Enrich. Your Zap calls an enrichment API (or a custom webhook) to look up company size and industry.
3. Summarise & score. An AI step condenses the free‑text message and assigns a priority score using rules (e.g., job title + region).
4. Route. High‑priority leads create a CRM record, an owner, and a Slack alert; lower‑priority leads get a nurture tag.
5. Draft reply. The AI step drafts a human‑sounding email that the owner reviews before sending.
6. Log. Every step writes a trace (inputs, outputs, IDs) to your data warehouse.

This is quick to build in Zapier using AI Copilot for the outline, AI by Zapier for the generation step, and Formatter with AI to clean fields—then a webhook to your API for the scoring logic you want tight control over.  

Design for reliability first

• Idempotency. Make writes idempotent using external IDs so retries don’t create duplicates.
• Backoff & retries. Respect API rate limits; exponential backoff beats “retry immediately”.
• Dead‑letter queues. When something fails after N attempts, send the payload to a “needs attention” inbox.
• Observability. Log correlation IDs across steps and store minimal but sufficient metadata to debug.
• Config, not code. Keep prompts, thresholds, and routing rules as configuration so non‑devs can tune them.

Where Zapier’s new AI features help

• AI Copilot for build‑time speed. Describe your workflow and get an outlined Zap with trigger and actions pre‑scaffolded; then you refine, test, and publish.
• Formatter with AI for messy data. Ask for “convert 12/08/25 to ISO date” or “extract the amount from this email” and it drafts the transform step.
• AI Actions and Agents for orchestration. Let an AI agent call thousands of app actions (send a Slack, create a HubSpot lead, find a calendar event) under guardrails you define.  

When to graduate to your own API

Move key logic into an API when you need:

• Throughput & latency guarantees beyond typical iPaaS limits.
• Sensitive data controls, such as field‑level encryption, PII redaction, and regional routing.
• Versioned behaviour (e.g., “scoring‑v2”) and canary releases.
• Determinism in critical steps (invoicing, eligibility) with AI limited to drafting, not deciding.

Pattern: The orchestrator triggers your /decide endpoint with a payload reference; your service fetches needed data, applies rules & models, and returns a minimal decision object. The orchestrator then performs side‑effects (create/update/notify). You keep strict separation between decision and action.

Governance & cost control from day one

• Secrets & scopes. Use per‑Zap service accounts and the least privilege required. Rotate keys.
• Prompt hygiene. Store prompts in a repo, review like code, and annotate with examples.
• Budget caps. Track tokens or run‑minutes per flow; alert before you burn the month’s budget.
• Human‑in‑the‑loop. For customer‑facing content, require review until you’ve measured quality over time.
• Security reviews. Adopt a short checklist (PII? retention? data egress?). For more advanced programmes, align to an AI risk framework and the OWASP guidance for LLM apps.  

Common pitfalls (and fixes)

• Automating chaos. If the underlying process is unclear, automation will speed up the mess. Map it first.
• Brittle dependencies. Replace HTML scraping with APIs; add contract tests to catch breaking changes.
• Over‑automation. If a step requires nuanced judgement or has legal risk, add a review queue.
• No escape hatch. Always design a manual fallback for critical paths (e.g., hand‑off to a shared inbox).
• Silent failures. Alerts to a channel + weekly digest keep humans in the loop.

FAQ

Do I need a developer? You can ship meaningful automations without code. But a few hours from an engineer—for idempotency, logging, and security—pays for itself quickly.

Which LLM should I use? Start with the model your platform supports out of the box (Zapier includes a built‑in option), then swap if you need domain‑specific strengths. Keep prompts and interfaces model‑agnostic.  

How do we handle sensitive data? Redact before sending to models, prefer providers with enterprise controls, and separate “decide” from “act”. See our companion post on AI data security.  

What about vendor lock‑in? Keep your business logic in your configs and APIs; the orchestrator becomes a replaceable shell.

‍